Is Net Metering Worth It in 2026? (NEM 3.0 & Export Rules)
This article is published by SolarInfoPath, an independent research and education platform. SolarInfoPath has no financial relationship with any solar installer, manufacturer, lender, lead generation service, or utility company. We do not sell solar products, earn referral fees, or accept sponsored content. All articles are based on publicly available data from sources including the U.S. Department of Energy, IRS.gov, U.S. Treasury, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), and public court and regulatory records.
Information Currency: Solar policy, tax law, utility programs, and financing products change frequently. While SolarInfoPath updates content regularly, some details may not reflect the most recent developments in your state. Always confirm current rules with the appropriate government agency, utility company, or licensed professional before taking any action.
If you are researching solar panels and wondering is net metering worth it in the USA, the real answer is not the same everywhere. Net metering is the billing system that gives you credit when your solar panels send extra electricity back to the grid. But the value of that credit changes a lot depending on your state and utility rules.
Now look at a simple scenario. A home using 900 kWh per month consumes about 10,800 kWh per year. If that home exports 30% of its solar production back to the grid, and the utility credits it at 16¢ per kWh, that can equal around $500+ per year in bill credits. But if the credit rate drops to 8¢ per kWh, that value is cut almost in half. Same system, very different outcome.
Why do two solar homes in different states get completely different net metering results even with similar systems?
The answer is simple. Net metering rules are not uniform. Some states still offer near full retail credits, while others have shifted to reduced export rates or time-based compensation. That means the same 6–8 kW system can feel highly profitable in one state and only moderately beneficial in another.
That is why net metering in 2026 is no longer a simple yes-or-no question. It is a location-based calculation where your state policy, utility rate, and export credit rate decide how valuable solar really becomes.
The Direct Answer: Is Net Metering Worth It by State?
Here is the verdict most articles skip. Net metering is worth it in some states, limited in others, and genuinely weak in a few. This is the honest breakdown:
Worth it — strong net metering states:
- New York offers full retail net metering, meaning every kilowatt hour you export earns a credit equal to what you would pay to buy that electricity. At 21 cents per kilowatt hour, that credit has real value. Monthly bill savings for a standard system typically run $110 to $145.
- Massachusetts operates full retail net metering at around 24 cents per kilowatt hour. Credits roll forward month to month and do not expire. Monthly savings typically run $120 to $155 for a properly sized system.
- Florida requires all investor-owned utilities to offer net metering at retail rates. With solid year-round sun and reliable credit accumulation, Tampa and Orlando homeowners typically save $100 to $130 per month.
- Arizona utilities, including APS, offer net metering, though credit rates vary. Phoenix homeowners benefit from 6.5 peak sun hours per day, and monthly savings typically run $110 to $150.
Limited — reduced or inconsistent net metering states:
- California shifted to NEM 3.0 in 2023, cutting the export credit rate for new installations by roughly 75 percent compared to the previous policy. Solar still works financially in California, but the net metering component is far less powerful than it was. Pairing panels with battery storage is now the stronger strategy for new California installs.
- Texas has no statewide net metering policy. Some utilities offer export credits, others offer buyback programs at rates well below retail, and some offer nothing meaningful. Your savings from excess generation depend entirely on which utility serves your address.
- Illinois has a net metering policy, but inconsistent implementation across utilities. Chicago area homeowners served by ComEd receive credits, but the shorter winter days limit annual accumulation.
Weak — net metering adds little value:
- Kansas has limited net metering programs with credit rates that do not match retail electricity prices. Combined with an average electricity rate of around 11 cents per kilowatt hour, the financial case for solar in Kansas rests almost entirely on self-consumption rather than grid export.
The solar panels are worth it across U.S. states covers how net metering interacts with each state’s electricity rate to determine whether the overall investment makes sense.
How Net Metering Actually Works on Your Electricity Bill

Net metering is a billing arrangement, not a payment program. When your panels produce more electricity than your home uses during the day, that surplus flows to the grid and your meter runs backward. Your utility records those kilowatt hours as a credit on your account. When you pull electricity from the grid in the evening or on cloudy days, those credits offset what you would otherwise owe.
The result is that your monthly bill reflects only the net difference between what you consumed and what you produced. In a strong net metering state where credits are valued at retail rates, a well-sized system can reduce your bill to a small fixed service charge of $10 to $20 per month during peak production seasons. In states with reduced export credit rates, the bill reduction is real but more modest.
What surprises many homeowners is that net metering credits do not translate to a zero bill. Grid connection fees, basic service charges, and in some states fixed solar surcharges still apply regardless of how much electricity your system produces. These fixed charges typically run $10 to $25 per month and cannot be offset by net metering credits under most utility tariffs.
How solar panels cost less over time after incentives shows how net metering credit accumulation combines with the federal tax credit to reduce your effective system cost over the first several years.
City by City: Net Metering Value Across the USA
| City | Avg Sun Hours Per Day | Est. Monthly Net Metering Credit | Net Metering Status | Notes |
| Los Angeles, CA | 5.7 hrs | $40 to $70 | NEM 3.0 in effect | Export credits reduced 75% for new installs; battery storage is now essential |
| Phoenix, AZ | 6.5 hrs | $80 to $110 | Available via APS | Strong sun maximizes credit accumulation; summer months carry the year |
| Tampa, FL | 5.5 hrs | $75 to $100 | Full retail, statewide | Consistent credits year-round; one of the more reliable net metering states |
| Albany, NY | 4.5 hrs | $85 to $115 | Full retail | High electricity rate makes each credit more valuable despite fewer sun hours |
| Austin, TX | 5.2 hrs | $30 to $60 | Utility dependent | Austin Energy offers credits, but rates vary; no statewide protection |
What this table shows clearly is that credit value is driven by rate, not sun. Albany earns stronger monthly credits than Austin despite fewer sun hours because each kilowatt hour exported is worth nearly twice as much in New York.
How Net Metering Connects to Your Solar Payback Period

Net metering credit strength directly affects how long it takes to recover your solar investment. A system installed in Massachusetts with full retail net metering recovers its cost significantly faster than an identical system installed in Texas, where export credits are minimal,l and electricity rates are lower.
The math is straightforward. A 7kW system in Massachusetts costs around $23,500 before the 30 percent federal Investment Tax Credit, bringing out of pocket cost to roughly $16,450. With annual savings of $1,700 driven largely by self-consumption and strong net metering credits, payback arrives in about 9 to 10 years. The same system in Texas costs around $20,000, drops to $14,000 after the federal credit, but generates only about $1,100 in annual savings because export credits are limited and the electricity rate is lower. Payback stretches to 12 to 13 years.
That four-year difference in payback is largely explained by net metering policy, not sunlight or system quality. What is the solar payback period? U.S. states break down exactly how credit policy, electricity rates, and system costs combine to produce your specific timeline.
What Happens When Net Metering Rules Change After You Install
This is the honest limitation that most solar articles avoid saying directly. If your state weakens its net metering policy after you install, your monthly savings can drop without anything changing about your system. California homeowners who installed before NEM 3.0 grandfathered their better credit rates. Those who installed after experienced a fundamentally different financial return on the same hardware.
Several states, including Michigan, Nevada, and Georgia, are currently evaluating changes to their net metering structures. If you are making a 25 year financial decision based on current export credit rates, the policy risk is real and worth factoring into your expectations.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, net metering policies across the country vary widely and are subject to change through state regulatory proceedings. Monitoring your state’s public utility commission proceedings is the most direct way to stay informed about potential rule changes that could affect your system’s financial performance.
The federal solar tax credit and how it applies to your system cost is the one incentive that does not depend on your state’s net metering policy, which is why it matters even more in states where export credits are weak or uncertain.
Final Thoughts
Is net metering worth it in the USA? The answer is not the same for every homeowner because the rules are not the same in every state. It is a patchwork of utility tariffs, state policies, and credit structures that produce very different financial outcomes depending on where you live. New York and Massachusetts homeowners are working with one of the strongest net metering setups in the country. Florida and Arizona are reliable. California changed the rules in 2023 and the new structure is significantly less generous for new installations. Texas has no statewide policy at all, which means your outcome depends entirely on which utility serves your address.
If your state offers full retail net metering, it strengthens the financial case for solar in a real and measurable way. If it does not, your savings case needs to rest on self-consumption and electricity rate reduction rather than export credits. Those are two different financial calculations, and confusing them is the most common reason solar expectations do not match reality. Visit SolarInfoPath for state-specific breakdowns that help you run the right numbers for your home.
FAQs
What is net metering?
Net metering is a billing system where excess solar power from your home flows back to the grid in exchange for bill credits. In my experience, it lowers what you owe over time rather than providing cash payments.
How does net metering work month to month?
You may notice credits building up during sunny months and being used later when production drops. Utilities typically apply these credits to offset future electricity charges on your bill.
Is net metering bad for homeowners?
I wouldn’t say it’s bad, but it’s not perfect either. Some programs reduce export values, which can feel worse in states where net metering rules change often.
Can you make money with net metering?
In most cases, no. Net metering usually reduces your electricity bill, but extra credits tend to roll over or expire instead of being paid out in cash.
Do net metering credits expire?
This depends on your state and utility. I’ve seen annual expirations in some areas, while others allow credits to roll over for longer periods.

Morgan Lee | Lead Solar Policy & Consumer Research Analyst
Morgan Lee is the founder of SolarInfoPath and an independent solar research analyst with over 10 years of experience studying the U.S. residential and commercial solar market. Morgan’s research focuses on how real homeowner outcomes compare to the savings projections presented during solar sales, a gap that has led to thousands of consumer complaints and active class action lawsuits across New York, California, Texas, and Florida.
All research published on SolarInfoPath is drawn from primary sources, including the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), IRS and Treasury guidance under the Inflation Reduction Act, state public utility commission documents, and publicly filed court records related to solar consumer protection cases.
With a background in legal studies, Morgan interprets complex topics, federal tax credits under Section 25D and Section 48, Power Purchase Agreement contract terms, net metering policy changes, and solar litigation, in plain language that homeowners can actually use, without providing legal or financial advice.
SolarInfoPath was built after observing that most homeowners commit $25,000 to $40,000 to a solar system based on incomplete or misleading information, while almost every available source of solar education online has a financial relationship with the industry it covers. SolarInfoPath has no installer affiliations, no lead generation, and no affiliate income. Every article is independent, research-based, and written for informational purposes only.







